Effective Immediately: New Facebook Game- I Am Now Deleting Friends Who are Regularly and Continually Negative and/or Vulgar (Plus, How to Actually Delete Facebook Friends)

The Rules: If you have been making a habit of posting negative facebook statuses, the next time it happens, you get deleted.

It’s not you… it’s me.  For my own sanity, I have to reduce noise pollution in my own life.  Though I was at skeptical at first, realizing a campaign like this might come across as… rude or judgmental… I’ve already received some positive feedback on it.  So I know there are others who understand where I’m coming from on it. This is what I need to do to be able to afford to keep enjoying facebook:

By enjoying the quality of friends- not the quantity of friends.

Nearly a month ago, I started a new facebook game where I promised to delete any facebook friend who complained about Monday’s. Fortunately, word evidently got out and I have yet to find anyone to delete. Though I admit I was trigger happy, at least my plan worked.  Now I’m taking it a broad step further.

I am a realistic and practical optimist.  I understand that life isn’t always puppy dogs and rainbows, and I understand the importance of emphasizing with someone when they are going through a tough time.  But not all the time… if it’s on facebook.  I am a facebook friend, not a facebook psychiatrist.  (Though I would gladly counsel and help anyone who privately asked me.)

In fact, I went ahead and got a good taste of blood about 30 minutes ago by deleting three friends.  I liked it, a lot.  I’ve been on facebook since March 2005, and I finally got motivated enough to actually delete some people.  Just to make sure we’re clear on what constitutes as being “continually negative/or vulgar”, I’ll give a few examples of what it takes to get deleted:

*make a habit of complaining about the ups and downs of your dating relationships

*often show disrespect to either gender by classifying them all as the bad stereotype, though you yourself are the one constantly attracting and being attracted to that kind of undatable person

*dare to practice tasteless attempts at being funny (ex: using rape as comic material, badmouthing other religions, making fun of physical or mental handicaps, etc.)

*use extreme profanity (when it comes to facebook etiquette, it goes without saying there is no need to use the “f-word” or other sexual slurs, as well as religious slurs or starting religious/anti-religious arguments)

Why have I invented this exciting new facebook game?  Is it to try to be funny? No… that’s only about 5% of the reason.  The main reason is because I have recently begun making a deliberate effort to shape my own reality.  No two people share the same reality. But what we see in front of us day after day can often become what we accept as reality.

And honestly, I don’t need any extra negativity in my life.  There’s no need in allowing more people to add to the noise.  I’m not asking for a PG rated version of life, but I am the kind of guy who appreciates a touch of class.  There has to be some standard of dignity on facebook that I can expect to see each day.  Some people quit facebook all together over stuff like this.  This is my way of taking matters into my own hands, on my own terms.

*Please note: I don’t care what coarse language or subject matter that a person uses in the real world, since that is a person’s private life, but… facebook is not part of our private lives, even though there is an illusion that is.  Facebook is personal, but definitely not private.  I am weeding out the people who have difficulty seeing the difference between the two, for my own sake, not theirs.

If I delete you, the only way you can be welcomed back in the fold is by submitting a 200 word essay explaining why I should accept your friend request and you will have to post it on my facebook wall once I approve you as a friend.  Bribes are encouraged.

This is an open game.  Anyone is welcome to join.

Bonus: How to Delete a Facebook Friend

1.  Look on the left hand side of your screen, whether on your profile or your home page on facebook.  Click on “Friends”

2.  Next, click “Edit Friends”.

3.  Type in the person’s name in the search box.

4. Click on the “x” next to their name when you see it.

5.  Lastly, click “Remove From Friends”.

And that, my friends, is how you lose friends.  On purpose, that is.

What Movie Rating Does Real Life Get? (G, PG, PG-13, R, or NC-17)

If your life was a movie, what would it be rated?

I recently watched a documentary questioning the secrecy and allusiveness of the MPAA movie rating system, called “This Film is Not Yet Rated”. While I’m not opposed to the American movie rating system because I see it as a decent way for parents to decide which movies are more suitable for their children, I also admit there is some humor in the way that movies are arbitrarily given ratings.

In general, more than one f-word grants an “R” rating. “Artistic or comic nudity” can land with “PG-13” or even “PG”, but if the nudity involves romantic or sexual content, then the movie will be an “R”. A panel of judges make a living off of making that call.

By now it’s pretty obvious that most studios want the majority of their films to be rated “PG-13” because more people will be able to see it. “PG” is for young kids and “R” weeds out the kids who are not smart enough to pay for one movie but walk into another.

The thing that most stood out to me from watching the documentary was this:

Compared to Europe, America has it backwards when it comes to sexuality and violence in movies. In Europe, sex scenes are portrayed in a more matter-of-fact/this-just-part-of-life manner. An absence of chiseled abs, large breasts, and steamy music. Not glamorized.

But when it comes to violence, Europe leaves a lot more to the imagination. They’re more offended by violence and less worried about sexual content.

In America, our movies are infiltrated by sex any time there’s a slight opportunity for it. But it’s so fake. Women have the sex drives of men. The atmosphere is perfect. The lighting is just right. And of course both participants have perfect bodies that could be (and often have been) featured partially nude on a health magazine cover. For me it’s just not believable.

Yet despite our obsession, compared to Europe, we’re much more offended by sex in movies. Culturally, America is a Christian nation. So we’re much more likely to be bothered or affected by heavy sexual content in a movie.

So we shy away from sex in movies, but indulge in violence. And not just grotesque stuff like the Saw movies.

We love war movies. We just do. Because there’s nothing more American than seeing the good guys kill the bad guys.

Like any James Bond movie for example. Loaded with countless murders by gunshots. Yet a lack of blood. Therefore, James Bond movies aren’t rated “R”, but “PG-13” instead.

The theory is that violent movies have this undertone that speak to teenage boys and young men: “Just imagine, if you fought in the U.S. military, you could be the one with the gun. Protecting our country. Killing and defeating the enemy.”

The regular presence of violence in American entertainment desensitizes us to it. The more we see it, the more we’re used to it. And it’s not really a moral issue to us.

While we may not be willing to be part of the firing squad that executes an American criminal convicted of murder and rape, our conscious doesn’t bother us as much about killing the enemy in a war who happened to be born in the wrong country with a dictator who is forcing him to fight against us. Yet he may have never killed or raped anyone. Until now, he could be just a another normal family man. But if he doesn’t fight for his corrupt political leader, his life will end anyway.

Both the sex and the violence are fake. We know this. But our conscience doesn’t really bother us about watching Saving Private Ryan or Band of Brothers (which neither really contain any sexual content).

I’ve noticed that Baptist preachers can mention Saving Private Ryan during a sermon to drive home a point and no one in the congregation thinks twice. We’ll overlook the vulgar language and bloody deaths in the name of war. Yes, it’s violent. But it’s war.

The point: Even Baptist preachers don’t mind violence, as long as it’s associated with war. I know this because I’ve been in the congregation enough to hear it. But if a movie was rated “R” for any other reason than war violence, it would be taboo for the preacher to admit he even saw the movie.

I get it. It makes sense.

America excuses violence. But has a tough time with the other stuff.

Now that I’ve established that America is okay with violence, I will quote Michael Tucker. He is the producer of the 2004 war documentary film, Gunner Palace, which shows the everyday lives of soldiers fighting in Iraq. This film is unique in that it received a “PG-13” rating, despite it’s 42 uses of the f-word and brutal violence and imagery. Tucker had to appeal the MPAA because of course they originally rated his film “R”:

“When a little girl was running down the road in South Vietnam, burnt by Napalm and she’s naked, is that PG? Is it PG-13? Is it R? You can’t rate reality.”

Great quote. I’ve seen the exact photograph he’s referring to. It’s awful. And I’ve seen even more hellish pictures from The Rape of Nanking during World War II, when Japan occupied China, raping all females and killing all men they could find in that city.

That can’t be rated. It’s so worse than “R”. Worse than NC-17. Yet those photographs can easily be found in Wikipedia or in any History section in a Borders or Barnes and Noble. It’s not fiction. It’s not art. It’s reality.

Michael Tucker is right: You can’t rate reality.

In the back of my mind I’ve always wondered what my life would be rated if it were a movie. The question is, how would my life not be rated “R”? Just considering an average workday. Even on a tame day, I know the language I hear around me would be rated “R”. As it definitely was in high school.

I guess I’ve always thought it’s ironic to hear a handful of f-words in a movie and know the movie is rated “R” because of the language itself. Hearing that language has become normal to me. Which of course defeats the whole idea of certain words being vulgar. When they’re common, they can’t truly be as vulgar as we let ourselves believe.

One of my biggest reasons not to use profanity is for that very reason. It just seems cliche to me. I can’t bring myself to do it.

Yet watching a movie than contains a few f-words is at least a little bit offensive and shocking. Why? Because it’s not in real life? Isn’t there a double standard somewhere in there?

Why, in real life, is it not a big deal to us?

Because it’s not real. Watching it happen to someone else in a movie makes it worse. It’s magnified. We pay closer attention. We’ll except it in real life, though.

It’s a funny thought.  To give a movie rating to real life.  Especially your own.

Related post by the same author:

Mixed Reviews  http://wp.me/pxqBU-2y

The Ball  http://wp.me/pxqBU-fv

And one more thing… Now that you’ve read my take on this, why not read my perspective on being a dad?  That’s right- parenting from a dad’s point of view.  I have been documenting my thoughts as a dad since the week we found out my wife was pregnant.  I formally invite you now to read my “dad blog” by clicking on the link below:

dad from day one